Solutions

Strategic Conflict Resolution and Separation Management Service

SPATIO develops advanced U-space services to provide a solution in a multi-USSP environment. In this case, strategic phase services: Strategic Conflict Detection (SCD) and Strategic Conflict Resolution (SCR) services. These advanced services are integrated with a complementary and centralised service: U-space Separation Management (USM), which provides information regarding the U-space airspace, as well as the protection volume to be applied to flight plans. Moreover, SPATIO proposes a set of fairness rules, which apply to UAS operator. The integration of all these concepts optimises the management of unmanned flight plan distribution.​

This solution targets the class G airspaces segregated from manned aviation, so that unmanned aircrafts can operate in Very Low-Level (VLL) airspaces in rural, suburban, and urban scenarios.​

With this solution, SPATIO provides benefits to main users of U-space Service Providers (operators and pilots) in terms of access and equity by using fairness rules, mission efficiency and capacity by optimising the airspace with the SCD and SCR services.​

Dynamic Capacity Management service

SPATIO addresses some functionalities of the Dynamic Capacity Management (DCM) service: among others, the detection of hotspots associated with collision risks, as well as environmental and social impact, and then, the resolution of those hotspots using a set of pre-defined Demand and Capacity Balancing (DCB) measures. These hotspots are intrinsically governed by Separation Minima information provided by a centralised service: the U-space Separation Management service.​

This solution is designed for segregated class G airspaces where interaction with manned aviation is not expected due to the Very-Low Level (VLL) U-space airspaces. SPATIO addresses rural, suburban, and urban scenarios where social impact is key, especially in the last two environments.​

With this solution, SPATIO benefits citizens and society by balancing the capacity based on environmental and safety aspects with the collision risk, environmental and social impact models developed.​

Tactical Conflict Prediction, Resolution and Implementation

SPATIO Solution 2A aims to deliver ground-based services that provide separation management at a tactical level, namely Tactical Conflict Prediction (TCP) and Tactical Conflict Resolution (TCR) services, working collaboratively with the Strategic Conflict Resolution services already in place.​

The TCP retrieves the separation minima relative to the U-space of interest from the U-space Separation Management (USM) service; subsequently, its role is to predict potential conflicts between cooperative U-space operations (including manned flights). The airspace of interest is the Very Low-Level (VLL) airspace, in class G, assuming the conspicuity of the involved flights. U-space achieves conspicuity through non-visual means, such as electronic methods.​

After a conflict is predicted, the TCR service is responsible for providing conflict-free resolutions and monitoring their implementation. Pilot engagement in this phase is fundamental: instructions are communicated interactively to ensure acknowledgment and bilateral understanding of the proposed steps.​

Solution 2A considers a multi-U-space Service Provider (USSP) environment, where several concurrent separators operate in uncontrolled airspace. The goal of ground-based separation provision is to enhance safety and capacity for a given airspace compared to a U-space airspace where only strategic services are available.

Tactical conflict prediction, resolution and implementation with onboard extension

SPATIO Solution 2B aims to deliver ground-based services that provide separation management at a tactical level, specifically Tactical Conflict Prediction (TCP) and Tactical Conflict Resolution (TCR) services, working collaboratively with the already established Strategic Conflict Resolution services.​

Solution 2B takes a step further compared to Solution 2A. As mentioned, pilot engagement is fundamental in order to implement the suggested resolutions; accordingly, a monitoring process will assess if action is being taken in a timely manner. Nonetheless, it may happen that the operator fails/is incapacitated to acknowledge and implement the proposed steps. In situations like these, minimal corrective instructions (e.g., hover) will be sent directly on-board of the UAV through a dedicated link to mitigate as much as possible the risk of conflict: the pilot is expected to always be vigilant during the resolution process, hence liable to implement the corrective actions for the whole duration of the resolution. Indeed, he/she is expected to regain control of the UAV at any moment.​

Compared to Solution 2A, the direct on-board implementation of corrective actions can provide an additional layer of safety, especially in those cases where communication channels are partially reliable, or the pilot/operator could become incapacitated.​

Solution 2B also considers a multi-U-space Service Provider (USSP) environment, where several concurrent separators operate in uncontrolled airspace. The goal of ground-based separation provision is to enhance safety and capacity for a given airspace compared to a U-space airspace where only strategic services are available.​